Day 2: Artem Kozachenko — Workshop Assignment#3
Day 2: Artem Kozachenko — Workshop Assignment#3artemkozachenko-inv wants to merge 3 commits intokoldovsky:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 1 minutes and 52 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughДодано набір нових документаційних файлів: кореневий Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 7✅ Passed checks (7 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.cursor/rules/security.mdc:
- Around line 1-33: The Security rule is too generic for Excalidraw; update the
"User-controlled data" and "Collaboration and network" sections and add short,
concrete guidance covering SVG/canvas XSS, Content Security Policy, safe
handling of .excalidraw imports, and end-to-end encryption/Firebase rules:
explicitly call out SVG/canvas sanitization/escaping patterns and forbid raw SVG
injection, recommend a strict CSP policy and where to configure it, document
validation and virus/format checks for .excalidraw and imported libraries, and
require E2EE expectations or explicit reviewer sign-off for any
collaboration/room/auth changes (including Firebase security rules). Ensure the
new sentences are concise and placed near the existing "User-controlled data"
and "Collaboration and network" headings so reviewers can find and verify them.
In `@AGENTS.md`:
- Line 45: The link label currently shows ".github/copilot-instructions.md"
which is fine as a directory path, but the accompanying description should use
the correct platform capitalization "GitHub" when referring to the service;
update the descriptive text for the link (the label or adjacent description in
AGENTS.md referencing
[.github/copilot-instructions.md](./.github/copilot-instructions.md)) to use
"GitHub" for the platform name while leaving the directory path
`.github/copilot-instructions.md` unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 4301cd6e-d024-4f50-927e-6f9bef85a0c8
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
ONBOARDING.mdis excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
.cursor/CLAUDE.md.cursor/RULES-AB-VALIDATION.md.cursor/commands/add-locale-string.md.cursor/commands/analyze-error.md.cursor/commands/generate-component.md.cursor/commands/pre-merge-verify.md.cursor/commands/refactor.md.cursor/rules/architecture.mdc.cursor/rules/conventions.mdc.cursor/rules/do-not-touch.mdc.cursor/rules/excalidraw-app.mdc.cursor/rules/security.mdc.cursor/rules/testing.mdcAGENTS.md
artemkozachenko-inv
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@AGENTS.md`:
- Around line 1-139: Add an explicit "Tech Stack" section to AGENTS.md that
centralizes the distributed mentions of React, TypeScript, Vite, Yarn
workspaces, and Vitest; update the top-level table of contents / headings to
include this new section and move or cross-reference the existing scattered
lines (e.g., the React mention around line 50, Vite around line 68, TypeScript
around line 97, Vitest lines 60-63) into that single section so readers can
quickly find stack details while leaving the rest of the document unchanged.
- Around line 48-52: Add an optional "Tech Stack" section immediately after the
existing "What this repo is" heading in AGENTS.md that consolidates runtime,
build, testing, rendering, and state/tooling details (e.g., React, TypeScript
strict, Vite, Yarn workspaces, Vitest, Canvas/rough.js, Jotai/Action system) so
the repository's stack is easy to find; update the file by inserting a concise
bullet list labeled "Tech Stack" following the "What this repo is" paragraph.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 8344115c-eedc-47bb-b72c-3a9b4ff5e843
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.cursor/rules/security.mdcAGENTS.md
1 participant
Day 2: Workshop Assignment
Учасник: Artem Kozachenko
Чеклист
.cursor/rules/(кожне з секцією "How to verify").cursor/commands/AGENTS.md— заповнений повністю (контекст проєкту, команди, архітектура, конвенції)yarn buildпроходить успішноБонус (необов'язково)
npx repomix --skill-generate.cursorrules— legacy-формат правил для CursorНотатки
Summary by CodeRabbit
Нотатки про випуск